Sir,

Thank you for providing me with the opportunity to expose the FACTS in this as well as the Kashmir scenario.

Indian Hindus comprise about 80% of the Indian population. Approximately, one in every seven human beings on the surface of this earth is an Indian Hindu. I suggest that the readers do some quick math and check the ratio of bloodshed/global terrorism carried out, by the MAJOR religions in the world. Historically as well as presently. Are the Hindus responsible for one-seventh of the global blood letting???

I beg to submit that while the world is well aware of certain holocausts, it is unaware of the holocaust of the Hindus at the hands of the followers of Islam.

Indeed the Hindu Kashmiris have been subjected to ethnic cleansing and genocide. The survivors are refugees in their own country. Such is the nature of Islam!

It thus pains me to no end when the pain of the Hindus is belittled, as you do in your article on Ayodhya.

Perhaps you may want to consider that we the residents of India are more familiar with the bloodletting and terrorism caused by the Jihadis. More often than not sponsored by Pakistan.

Conclusion: India particularly the Hindus of India are not a major source of terrorism, global bloodshed, agressive invasion of other countries. How about giving credit where it is due, instead of lending a cynical slant to an overt act of terrorism upon a Hindu place of worship.

To be more candid: Compare the amount of global bloodletting carried out by the three Abrahamic religions to the acts by the Hindus.

I rest my case.