Many, Many Problems With The Russia Today Article

For instance, Paul Gillies, a former Vermont Deputy Secretary of State, attorney and history, has made no statement asserting the legality of secession as the process is proposed by the small Second Vermont Republic group. He has said,

"Now, the decision to secede is not ours to make. Obviously, it’s a joint decision, and no matter how different Vermonters may seem from the rest of America, America isn’t exactly about to let us go."

and,

"It doesn't make economic sense, it doesn't make political sense, it doesn't make historical sense. Other than that, it's a good idea."

I saw the Russia Today piece and saw that with all its errors it really wouldn't be worth the time to respond to it.

Fact is, the SVR secession plan went belly-up when its leadership refused to break their ties to Southern white supremacist groups and began to purge local Vermonters from their ranks for voicing their own objections to the leadership stance. Much of what's left of the group is primarly out-of-state in origin and marginalized by their other extreme views on 9/11, sun spot activity as it relates to activist fortunes and creation beams.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.