Eclipsed from the headlines by the ongoing carnage, there is an active
civil resistance in Iraq that opposes the occupation, the torture regime
it protects, and the jihadi and Ba'athist 'resistance' alike.
Submitted by Bill Weinberg on Sat, 10/06/2007 - 15:15.
Backing guerillas on a neighbor's territory is an odd way to "stabilize" it... The only conceivable way you can read it that way is the possibility that Afewerki is wooing the guerillas away from the US and to the negotiating table. Which I suppose is a possibility.
I don't claim to know what Eritrea's Sudan strategy is. I merely raised the question for discussion. Does somebody have a problem with that?
Did you bother to read the Amnesty International page I linked to? Perhaps you missed this paragraph:
Torture
Torture is routinely used as a punishment by the Eritrean security forces for political, military and religious prisoners. They are held incommunicado without charge or trial in military or security prisons. Virtually no medical treatment is provided for torture injuries or any illness contracted in the harsh conditions in the prisons or metal shipping containers where many detainees are held. The judicial or security authorities have never investigated or prosecuted any case of torture, enforced disappearance or death in custody.
Torture methods include being beaten severely and being tied for long periods in painful positions, which is also commonly used against men and women fleeing conscription or for other military offences.
If you make excuses for this shit, you squander your legitimacy to oppose what is going on at Gitmo. Or didn't that occur to you?
Being called an idiot by someone who can't spell the word is too ironic to warrant comment.
»
Reply
google2
For more breaking news and world events, seeThe first open media site where anyone can report from anywhere
Advertisements:
Propaganda:
The inconvenient facts and unanswered questions surrounding the attacks are legion, but the endemic sloppiness of the self-styled "researchers" is delegitimizing the entire project of critiquing the "official version." The ostentatiously named "Truth movement" is not clearing the air, but muddying the water.
WW4 Report pamphlets
WAR AT THE CROSSROADS
An Historical Guide Through the Balkan Labyrinth
The Balkan region is intensely multicultural - a point of crossroads and clash for some of the world's major religions, cultural spheres, and economic systems. While there have been vicious wars in Balkan history, these have taken place in the context of manipulation by imperial powers and the self-serving local leaders who cater to them.
There you go with "stabilize" again...
Backing guerillas on a neighbor's territory is an odd way to "stabilize" it... The only conceivable way you can read it that way is the possibility that Afewerki is wooing the guerillas away from the US and to the negotiating table. Which I suppose is a possibility.
I don't claim to know what Eritrea's Sudan strategy is. I merely raised the question for discussion. Does somebody have a problem with that?
Did you bother to read the Amnesty International page I linked to? Perhaps you missed this paragraph:
If you make excuses for this shit, you squander your legitimacy to oppose what is going on at Gitmo. Or didn't that occur to you?
Being called an idiot by someone who can't spell the word is too ironic to warrant comment.