The answer you entered to the math problem is incorrect.

"Apartheid Wall"

"Israel can't protect itself by the most passive way it can be done?"

Does that include illegally building 80% of the wall inside occupied territory in order to annex land? I'd hardly call that "passive." That's active theft.

http://www.btselem.org/english/Publications/Summaries/200512_Under_the_Guise_of_Security.asp

The fact that the Separation Barrier cuts into the West Bank was and remains the main cause of human rights violations of Palestinians living near the Barrier. Israel contends that the Barrier's route is based solely on security considerations. This report disputes that contention and proves that one of the primary reasons for choosing the route of many sections of the Barrier was to place certain areas intended for settlement expansion on the "Israeli" side of the Barrier. In some of the cases, for all intents and purposes the expansion constituted the establishment of a new settlement.

You talk about not recognizing Israel; does helping itself to whatever occupied Palestinian territory it covets show that Israel has any intention of recognizing a Palestinian state, or just the leftovers denuded of arable land and water resources, and label the remaining bantustans a "state?"

Reply

Please solve the math problem above and type in the result. e.g. for 1+1, type 2
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options